<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Reputation Management Case Study: Baptism by Fire | Bramblog</title>
		<link>http://www.bramblog.com/reputation-management-case-study-baptism-by-fire/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Sapan Behar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 23:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bramblog.com/reputation-management-case-study-baptism-by-fire/#comment-62</guid>
		<description>I came across this post following your commet on Morgan's REW blog. I can understand someone going after REW or Morgan as he clearly is at the top of his game and it natural for some unethical competition to go after him in this manner. That they would go after REW's clients is disgusting.

I also see that you are using LLL. The other day I came across a blogspot post where they were discussing that Google is not allowing links to blogs that are not blogspot blogs and they were speculating how Google may be not considering backlinks in comments anymore</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came across this post following your commet on Morgan&#8217;s REW blog. I can understand someone going after REW or Morgan as he clearly is at the top of his game and it natural for some unethical competition to go after him in this manner. That they would go after REW&#8217;s clients is disgusting.</p>
<p>I also see that you are using LLL. The other day I came across a blogspot post where they were discussing that Google is not allowing links to blogs that are not blogspot blogs and they were speculating how Google may be not considering backlinks in comments anymore</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
